";s:4:"text";s:24120:"17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; I. This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. DAVID MAAS, BARRY NG, ANITA PHAGAN, Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. Factual and Procedural Background To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Any argument is limited to five minutes. 6 asks the responding party to: IDENTIFY all payments m MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . CAL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. vs. HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Background Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the
12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Aug. 4, 2022) No. 9 Background and Discovery Dispute Santa Clara County Superior Court - Hall of Justice Physical : 190-200 West Hedding Street San Jose , CA 95110 Mailing : 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-808-6600 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Superior Court Hall of Justice hears criminal cases. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. INTRODUCTION Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. 3 Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. In response to the motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater v. Jason Goelz, et al. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. 9 MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. If you do not call the court and
HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. 23 I. 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. Background V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. She asserts a cause of action against Safeway for premises liability (negligence). Background If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. 13 SUPERIOR COURT VS. SPOT ON CONSULTING GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW This is an employment action for harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING LY, ET AL. Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Self-Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office, State Court (Judicial Council) Legal Glossary, Criminal Case Records - Viewing Criminal Records, Record Clearance - Clearing Criminal Records. IN RE MCAFEE, INC. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). IV. INTRODUCTION 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. VOLZ, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before
16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware CALLAN, ET AL. 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS 18 See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. 14 Please wait a moment while we load this page. I. For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. Footnote 19: Defendants. Agency (9th Cir. 3. Association, Inc., et al. Background AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. () 23 This is a putative class and repres 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE Contact Us. Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. INTRODUCTION 6 DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS. Factual and Procedural Background -2 Defendants Jaim Nulman (Nulman) and Yali Pharmaceutical, Ltd. (Yali) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Avelyn Welczer (Plaintiff). will be held. 8 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 11 PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, JOSEPH BASS, 12 DAVID BOGGINI, LAWRENCE JAY TENTATIVE RULING RE: CASTELLANO, RICHARD COCO, LESLYE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 13 CORSIGLIA, HARRY FREITAS, MICHAEL THE PLEADINGS GIUSTI, LINDA HORWEDEL (THE 7 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. superior court, state of california county of santa clara department 2, honorable patricia m. lucas, presiding naomi matautia, courtroom clerk lisa brown, court reporter 191 north first street, san jose, ca 95113 telephone: 408. WILVER CASTILLO V. RUSSELL STONE AND SIMPLY GREEN PLUMBING, INC. PALO ALTO PROPERTY OWNER LLC V. THE GROCERY MEN I, LLC, ET AL. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication 26 This is a putative class action. try clicking the minimize button instead. V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. : 21C37691 10 Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. 12 IN RE QUANTUM CORP. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Factual and Procedural Background Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. (Bank). KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. ALAN N. SLATER V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL. I. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. : 19CV350801 CourtCall is . 18CV327382]. 408.882.2296 (fax) Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant General Motors LLC (Defendant). 17 This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. ELAINE PICO, M.D. State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 5133 13 Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. INTRODUCTION 38). 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and ((See Declaration of (Richard J. CHARGE (RISC). (Id.) The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department
(Complaint, IT-1.) This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. I. SOSA V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Click on the Judge's name below for more details. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Proc. 16 corporation; PINNER USA, INC., a New Jersey ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. You are using an outdated browser. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: Code 3294(a). Court's
Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 4 Factual and Procedural Background JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL. 23 I. I. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. 20PR188357. HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning
Department of Child Support Services Cases. A.) Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 23 This is a putative class action. RAMIREZ, ET AL. Court Fees; Court Forms; Electronic Filing . V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. 24 You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. HI.Q, INC. According to the allegations of the complaint, on August 4, 2013, plaintiff Jason Wang (Plaintiff) purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Equinox vehicle (Vehicle) which was ma Calendar Line Nos. The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: XUEHUA WANG, ET AL. 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. 15 Factual and Procedural Background 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: 22 I. 1 3 Tentative Rulings. 15 (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Plaintiff Institute for Business & Technology, Inc. (Plaintiff) alleges that it has been a tenant at a commercial property located at 2400 Walsh Avenue in Santa Clara, California since 2003. Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: 4 try clicking the minimize button instead. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Background the court, limited argument will be entertained. This is a lemon law case. Line 4 On May 26, 2015, defendants Skanska USA Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA, Inc.); Skanska USA Building Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA Building, Inc.); DPR Construction, Inc.; Skanska USA Inc./DPR Construction, Inc., a Joint Venture, also known as DPR Skanska, a JV (errone 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. I. Footnote 18: 19 First NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. inclusive, JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges
The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. I. The motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper. 16 Defendant. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. RETAIL, INC., ET AL. KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's
Which Will do Business in California Please wait a moment while we load this page. 14 This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. You can always see your envelopes January 16, 2023. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 1 16 through 10, inclusive, 9 JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication All parties appearing on the Law and Motion
The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. If you do not have online access, you may call the
To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. The court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing. 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. 24 I. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Sanctions must be denied. will be able to access it on trellis. DATE: 24 June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. I. SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through 22 I. try clicking the minimize button instead. 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background Civil Tentative Rulings. Last. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Case Names: Mark Gomez, et al. ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar,
16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN inclusive, KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will
Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). alendar Line 4 RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. 408.882.2296 (fax) The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 3, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Patricia M. Lucas presiding. 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. Sacramento Superior Court
AND . 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. ";s:7:"keyword";s:51:"santa clara county superior court tentative rulings";s:5:"links";s:489:"Why Do Actors Wear Wedding Rings On Their Right Hand,
Tvdsb Secondary Calendar,
Tech Ridge Apartments,
Articles S
";s:7:"expired";i:-1;}